Tuesday, 29 March 2016
DISCOVERY OF WRECKAGE, UNRELIABLE.
This excerpt from a period newspaper refers to comments made by an experienced mariner, circa 1910.
"Well, now you have got me tied up in
a bit of a knot. All I can say is simply
this: It is possible, of course, that she
may still be afloat and adrift, but for my
own part I doubt it.
As to the absence of
wreckage on which so many seem to rely as
a proof that she is still above water, I place
little value on it,
and I think that view will
endorsed by everyone who has any real
acquaintance with the history and tragedies
of the sea."
The Harlow account fell short due to lack of wreckage discovered on the coast surrounding Cape Hermes. I am pleased to read that the good mariner 'placed little value on it'.
"I need only say that
out of the 144 steamships
lost in the trans
Atlantic trade alone, between
1879 no less than 24 not only failed
plete their passages, but left no evidence
as to the cause."
Waratah was by no means unique.
But circumstances surrounding the loss of the Waratah and conflicting accounts ensured that her mystery survives today, as vivid as it was in 1909.
andrew van rensburg
Share to Twitter
Share to Facebook
Share to Pinterest
Post a Comment
Post Comments (Atom)